ports every site, from the LLM you already use

Quick answer: ports every site, from the LLM you already use is ports opens a whole new way of dealing with sites and web apps from the LLM of your choice. Including the products that will never ship an MCP or an API.

Listed 2026-08-28 · Request removal

Definition: Port is an agentic software development lifecycle platform for creating internal developer portals. It brings service catalog information, developer self-service actions, automations, integrations, scorecards, and workflow capabilities into one web-based environment for engineering organizations.

What is Port used for?

Port is designed to help platform engineering, DevOps, developer experience, and software engineering teams organize how they discover services and complete operational work. Its central use is building an internal developer portal: a destination where developers can find information about software services, infrastructure, ownership, dependencies, and engineering processes.

The platform can also support service catalog management. Teams can use a catalog to establish a clearer picture of their engineering estate, rather than requiring people to search through separate tools for basic service context. This is relevant for organizations managing many repositories, deployed services, infrastructure resources, and operational workflows.

Port combines catalog capabilities with self-service and automation. Instead of routing common requests through manual tickets or direct messages, teams can provide defined actions in a portal. These actions can support recurring engineering operations while giving platform teams a more consistent way to expose approved workflows.

• Build internal developer portals for engineering users
• Create and maintain a software or service catalog
• Offer developer self-service actions
• Automate engineering and operational workflows
• Connect information and actions across engineering tools
• Use scorecards to assess defined standards or practices

How does Port support internal developer portals?

Port includes a no-code portal builder, allowing teams to configure an internal portal without presenting it as a traditional custom application development project. This can be useful when a platform team wants to create a tailored experience for developers while avoiding the overhead of building every portal interface from scratch.

A Port portal can act as a shared layer over engineering data and workflows. The platform describes this layer as queryable knowledge, enabling teams to work with information gathered from their engineering ecosystem. In practice, the objective is to make service-related context easier to locate and pair it with actions developers may need to run.

This approach suits teams that want to establish a consistent developer-facing interface across a number of systems. Rather than treating a catalog as only a static inventory, Port positions it as part of an environment for taking action, running workflows, and viewing engineering information in context.

Portal requirements differ substantially between organizations. Some teams may begin with a focused service catalog, while others may prioritize self-service workflows for infrastructure, delivery, or operational tasks. Port’s combination of catalog, automation, and portal-building functions means it can be considered for either starting point.

Which integrations and engineering tools can Port connect with?

Port is intended to work across an engineering ecosystem through integrations. The publicly listed examples include Kubernetes, Terraform, GitHub, and Jenkins. These represent several common areas of platform engineering work: infrastructure orchestration, infrastructure as code, source code collaboration, and automation or continuous integration workflows.

For teams, the value of integrations is not limited to linking tools at a high level. An internal developer portal is more useful when relevant service and operational information can be brought into a discoverable location, and when approved actions can connect back to the tools where work is performed. Port’s integrations and automations are therefore central to its stated platform purpose.

Before selecting Port, teams should evaluate the particular systems that matter to their environment and review the current integration documentation. A broad integration approach can be valuable, but the practical fit depends on the tooling already used by the organization and the workflows it plans to offer through the portal.

What are Port self-service actions, automations, and agentic workflows?

Self-service actions are a core part of Port’s platform. They are intended to give developers a way to initiate predefined work through the portal rather than relying entirely on manual platform-team intervention. This can make recurring activities more accessible when teams want developers to use standard processes.

Automations extend this model by helping organizations connect processes across their engineering tools. Workflow automation is one of Port’s stated use cases, along with engineering operations. The exact actions an organization provides will depend on its own policies, integrations, and operational design.

Port also lists agentic workflows as a product feature. This places the platform in the broader category of tools seeking to apply agent-oriented capabilities to software delivery and engineering operations. Organizations considering these capabilities should assess how workflows are configured, governed, reviewed, and connected to their engineering systems.

The combination of a service catalog and self-service workflows can be particularly useful for platform teams. A catalog provides context about services, while actions and automations can provide a path for completing work associated with those services. Port packages these capabilities as part of one platform rather than presenting them as unrelated tools.

How do scorecards and the knowledge layer work in Port?

Port includes scorecards and a queryable knowledge layer among its listed features. Scorecards can help teams evaluate services or other engineering entities against criteria they define. Engineering organizations may use such mechanisms when they need a more structured way to understand standards, practices, or maturity across their software estate.

The queryable knowledge layer is intended to make engineering information accessible for use within the platform. This matters because internal developer portals depend on useful context, not only navigation. A portal becomes more practical when users can identify the relevant service, understand its associated information, and find the appropriate action or workflow.

These capabilities can support developer experience and engineering operations teams that need visibility across many services. However, the usefulness of catalogs, scorecards, and knowledge layers depends on the quality of the data and the governance used to maintain it. Teams should determine what entities, ownership details, and standards they need before configuring a portal.

How much does Port cost?

Port has a free plan that is available for up to 15 seats. Its published paid pricing starts with the Basic plan at $30 per seat per month when billed annually. The Standard plan starts at $40 per seat per month when billed annually. Enterprise pricing is custom.

Organizations evaluating Port should confirm current plan details, seat requirements, included capabilities, and any enterprise terms directly with Port. Public tier pricing provides a starting point, but pricing details beyond the listed tiers are limited and enterprise costs are not publicly specified.

What are the limitations of Port?

Port is primarily focused on engineering, DevOps, platform engineering, and developer experience use cases. It may be less suitable for organizations seeking a general-purpose employee portal or a workflow platform aimed outside software delivery operations.

Although Port offers a free plan and published starting prices for Basic and Standard, public information does not provide all pricing details beyond those tiers. Enterprise pricing is custom, so larger organizations may need a direct discussion to understand costs and scope.

Port’s effectiveness also relies on an organization’s ability to connect and maintain relevant engineering data, integrations, service definitions, and workflows. Teams comparing Port with alternatives such as Backstage, Cortex, or OpsLevel should assess their required catalog model, integration coverage, portal-building preferences, self-service needs, and operational governance.

FAQ

What is Port?

Port is an agentic SDLC platform for building internal developer portals, service catalogs, self-service actions, automations, and integrations across engineering tools.

Does Port have a free plan?

Yes. Port offers a free plan for up to 15 seats.

Which tools can Port integrate with?

Port lists integrations including Kubernetes, Terraform, GitHub, and Jenkins. Teams should review Port documentation for current integration requirements and coverage.

Who is Port for?

Port is aimed at platform engineering teams, DevOps teams, developer experience teams, and software engineering organizations that need an internal developer portal.

What is an internal developer portal?

An internal developer portal is a developer-facing workspace for locating service information and accessing approved engineering workflows. Port provides tools to build this type of portal.

What should a software service catalog include?

A software service catalog commonly organizes service context such as ownership, dependencies, and operational information. Port provides catalog capabilities that teams can configure around their own engineering model.

How can developer self-service reduce operational work?

Developer self-service can let engineers initiate standardized actions without relying on manual platform-team handling for every request. Port supports self-service actions alongside automations and portal workflows.